ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025
Planarian microtubules form a network within muscle and regulate injury-induced genes essential for regeneration patterning.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proteomic and transcriptomic signatures of cytoskeletal remodeling during morphogenesis in the basal metazoanFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Planarian muscle produces key wound signal patterning whole-body regeneration. Within muscle, generic induction of wnt1 promotes tail regeneration, while polarized expression of the Wnt inhibitor notum at anterior-facing wounds drives head regeneration. Classic experiments indicate that microtubules are also involved in blastema fating, but the cell biology of planarian muscle is still poorly understood. We raised an antibody to muscle-expressed TUBA-2 and found that planarian muscle possesses a microtubule network linking contractile fibers with their mononucleated cell bodies. Microtubules were required for muscle fiber regrowth across wound sites at times that correlated with expression of wound-induced genes. Expression profiling found that sublethal colchicine treatment disrupted a subset of muscle-expressed injury-induced genes, with strongest effects on wnt1 and notum. Higher colchicine doses (>200 µg/ml) prevented wnt1 and notum expression, while, surprisingly, lower doses (125 µg/ml) elevated notum at posterior-facing wounds, thereby implicating microtubules in both the activation and polarization of genes expressed from injured muscle. Furthermore, microtubules functionally interact with Wnts to control head/tail determination. Together, planarian microtubules act in specific regulatory pathways to express key muscle-expressed and injury-induced factors used for blastema fating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.