Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099149›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of nutrition2025

Systematic organisation of skinfold callipers: an approach based on physical-mechanical properties and characteristics.

Joaquim Cintra, Timothy Lohman, Francesco Campa, Steven Heymsfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Skinfolds Measurement Protocols and Standards: A Narrative Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joaquim CintraFederal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-2939
Timothy LohmanEmeritus Faculty, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Francesco CampaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, https://ror.org/00240q980University of Padua, Padua, PD, Italy.
Steven HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skinfold callipers are used internationally in research, clinical and field settings to assess body composition and nutritional status. Notably, currently available instruments differ in important specificities that impact measurement. In this sense, this report proposes a methodological approach that organises skinfold callipers into three categories (

Indexed as

AnthropometrySkinfold ThicknessBody CompositionHumansNutritional StatusAnthropometryBody compositionNutritional assessmentSkinfold calliperSkinfold thickness

Identifiers

PMID41099149
PMCPMC12797072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.