ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2026
The Impact of Interfering Substances on Continuous Glucose Monitors: Part 2: Marketed Continuous Glucose Monitoring Designs, Labeled Interfering Substances, and Design Mitigations.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presented is a series of narrative reviews that summarize published information regarding the effect or potential effect of interfering substances on the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. While drawing together what is currently known regarding this topic, the future direction in this field and clinical implications posed by polypharmacy on CGM performance are considered. This second in a series of review articles introduces the glucose-sensing designs of commercially available continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and describes those interfering substances currently or historically identified within manufacturer's labeling for a given CGM model. Where known, an overview of the mechanistic effects of labeled interfering substances on the corresponding CGM designs is also described, as are sensor design approaches introduced by leading manufacturers to reduce interference effects. The review also considers: the effect of interferents on market-leading minimally invasive CGMs; design changes made to limit the flux of interfering substances to the sensor's glucose-sensing element; and an appraisal of the minimally invasive implantable Senseonics Eversense system, which employs a unique synthetic glucose-recognition ligand coupled to optical signal generation, which correspondingly gives rise to a unique interference profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.