ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Global Research Trends on Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07602985 (Evaluation Of Different Patterns Of Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Tears), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation Of Different Patterns Of Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Tears
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is a clinically significant injury recognized to accelerate cartilage degeneration. In recent years, research on MMPRT has expanded significantly, involving novel surgical techniques, biomechanical implications, and prognostic factors. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of MMPRT research focusing on research trends, predominant contributors, and emerging hotspots. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection served as the data source. Only original articles published in English from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2024, were considered eligible. The titles, authors, publication year, country, journals, keywords, and citation frequency were collected for comprehensive analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using the bibliometrix package in R, and VOSviewer was employed for network analysis and visualization, including co-citation analysis, coupling analysis, collaboration analysis, and co-occurrence analysis. Results: A total of 590 articles about MMPRT were included. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (KSSTA), American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM), and Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic And Related Surgery (Arthroscopy) emerged as the three predominant journals through co-citation analysis and coupling analysis. Furumatsu T emerged as the most prolific author, and Laprade RF emerged as the most influential author. The United States was the top contributor in the field of MMPRT research, and the collaboration between Korean research institutions is very close. The most frequent keyword was Horn, occurring 161 times. The keyword co-occurrence analysis revealed meniscal repair techniques and prognosis, especially biomechanical consequences, as the research hotspots. Conclusion: The field of MMPRT is undergoing rapid development, with the United States, Japan, and South Korea at the forefront of the world. It is expected that the field of MMPRT will remain active and achieve significant advancements. Presently, the research is focused on optimizing repair techniques and conducting biomechanical assessments. Our study provides valuable insights into future research directions and facilitates the translation of research findings into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.