ArticleIranian journal of pathology2025
Angiosarcoma Revisited: Diagnostic Challenges and a 16-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution.
Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: Angiosarcomas (AS) are rare, aggressive malignant tumors characterized by marked histopathologic heterogeneity, often mimicking other neoplasms and complicating diagnosis. This 16-year retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological spectrum of AS, with particular emphasis on diagnostic challenges and strategies for accurate identification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 11 histologically confirmed cases of AS diagnosed at our institution between January 2008 and December 2023. The data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, tumor location, histopathologic features, immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes. Results: Patient ages ranged from 25 to 62 years, with a slight female predominance (male-to-female ratio, 0.8:1). Tumor locations were variable, and histologic patterns ranged from well-differentiated, low-grade vascular proliferations resembling hemangiomas to poorly differentiated neoplasms mimicking pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcomas. IHC findings demonstrated overlapping marker expression, including cytokeratin (CK) positivity, which may lead to misdiagnosis as carcinoma, and loss of H3K27me3 expression, which can raise suspicion for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). Several cases also exhibited morphologic features closely resembling epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Conclusion: Angiosarcoma poses considerable diagnostic difficulty due to its morphologic variability and overlapping immunophenotypic profiles. Accurate diagnosis necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical, radiologic, and pathologic data. This study highlights the importance of diagnostic vigilance and comprehensive evaluation when assessing vascular neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.