ArticleIranian journal of pathology2025
EGFR Status by Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Evaluation of Prevalence and Association with Clinical and Pathological Parameters.
Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Overview of Emerging Trends in Targeted Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the expression patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in Kerman, Iran, and investigate its association with various clinicopathological factors. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 54 TNBC patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to assess EGFR expression levels in tumor tissue samples. Patients were classified as EGFR-positive or EGFR-negative based on IHC staining results. Clinicopathological data, including age, tumor grade, vascular invasion, lymph node involvement, Ki-67 proliferation index, presence of necrosis, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and microcalcifications, were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the association between EGFR expression and clinicopathological variables. Results: EGFR expression was positive in 61.1% of the patients. A significant association was found between EGFR positivity and higher tumor histologic grade (P = 0.045), with 69.7% of EGFR-positive patients exhibiting grade III tumors compared to 38.1% in the EGFR-negative group. Although not statistically significant, EGFR-positive patients tended to be younger (median age 44 years) than EGFR-negative patients (median age 52 years) (P = 0.157). The Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in EGFR-positive patients (median 60.0%) compared to EGFR-negative patients (median 47.5%). Conclusion: EGFR expression is significantly associated with higher tumor grade, suggesting a correlation with more aggressive tumor behavior. EGFR may serve as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in TNBC. Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to validate these findings and explore the implications of EGFR-targeted therapies in TNBC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.