ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
How factors connected to the natural environment shape football fans' eudaimonic and hedonic well-being.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Football fans contribute to pollution and environmental impact, yet how they perceive factors connected to the natural environment remains understudied. This study focuses on four such factors, including connectedness to nature, perceived environmental pollution, transport-specific environmental consciousness, and environmental knowledge, that are particularly relevant in the context of sports-related behavior. Understanding these perceptions is important, especially as environmental education alone often falls short in fostering sustained pro-environmental behavior. This connection is crucial, as individuals may be more inclined to adopt environmentally sustainable behaviors when such actions are perceived to support, or at least not undermine, their well-being. This study examines how factors connected to the natural environment relate to eudaimonic and hedonic well-being among football fans in Germany. Methods: Survey data was collected from 839 football fans of a German third-division club. Well-being was assessed using validated scales for eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Seemingly unrelated regression models were employed to examine how factors connected to the natural environment relate to the two well-being measures, controlling for demographic variables. Results: The findings indicated that, among fans, the assessed factors connected to the natural environment were moderately pronounced. Connectedness to nature and environmental knowledge scored slightly higher, while perceived environmental pollution and transport-specific environmental consciousness showed neutral ratings. Connectedness to nature was positively associated with both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Perceived environmental pollution was negatively linked to hedonic well-being, and transport-specific environmental consciousness was negatively related to eudaimonic well-being. No significant associations were found for environmental knowledge. Discussion: These results highlight the complex role of environmental perceptions in shaping football fans' well-being. While fostering connectedness to nature may enhance overall well-being, sustainability concerns may lead to psychological burdens. Investigating these dynamics in a population often viewed as environmentally indifferent challenges common stereotypes and reveals that football fans are aware of environmental issues. By understanding these perceptions, stakeholders can design sustainability initiatives that build on fans' existing values and behaviors, encouraging meaningful participation and environmentally responsible matchday practices that also support well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.