Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098989›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Research progress in artificial intelligence for brain metastases.

Dongxiang Wang, Wei Wang, Tong Li, Chenqi Liang, Xia Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dongxiang WangMedical Imaging, Faculty of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong, China.
Wei WangClinical Medicine, Faculty of Clinical and Basic Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tong LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chenqi LiangMedical Imaging, Faculty of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong, China.
Xia ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve, its integration into medical practice is becoming increasingly prominent, particularly in the field of neuro-oncology. This review examines the application of AI-specifically machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL)-in the imaging evaluation of brain metastases (BM). A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant studies published within the past 5 years. The retrieved literature was categorized and analyzed according to three key clinical tasks: segmentation, differential diagnosis, and prognostic prediction. We first outline the capabilities of AI in the automatic detection and segmentation of BM using advanced imaging techniques. Subsequently, we synthesize evidence on how AI aids in distinguishing BM from other intracranial structures and lesions. Finally, we discuss the emerging role of AI in predicting disease prognosis and the development of new metastatic abnormalities. Current evidence suggests that AI not only enhances diagnostic efficiency and reproducibility but also provides clinically meaningful insights that support personalized treatment planning. Importantly, the integration of AI into neuro-oncological imaging remains at a nascent stage, indicating substantial potential for future growth and refinement in both technical performance and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

brain metastasesCTdeep learningmachine learningMRI

Identifiers

PMID41098989
PMCPMC12518232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.