ReviewComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2025
Embracing change: Navigating menopause with the help of mobile health apps in Germany.
Review in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Study of Factors Affecting Medication Adherence in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have shown promise as potential solutions for mitigating the negative health impacts of menopause. However, there is a lack of standardized expert and user ratings regarding the quality of these apps, making it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, this app review aimed to summarize the currently available mHealth apps for menopause in Germany. Subsequently, the identified apps were evaluated, and their quality was assessed. Methods: A web crawler was used to search for mHealth apps related to the predefined search criteria, and information for all included apps was extracted (year of search: 2021). In the second step, healthcare providers and individuals experiencing menopause tested and evaluated the apps using the German version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-G). Results: The initial search yielded 6917 apps. Of these, 6879 were excluded, 32 duplicates were removed, three were available only in English, and one was designed for a specific drug treatment. The two remaining apps, Femilog and Mimeno, received low expert ratings ( Conclusion: This app review identified two mHealth apps for menopause in German that met the inclusion criteria. Both apps were found to have poor perceived therapeutic gain and received mixed ratings and recommendations from experts and users. Further studies on user experience and efficacy are necessary to make evidence-based recommendations regarding mHealth apps for individuals experiencing menopause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.