ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Accurate plant 3D reconstruction and phenotypic traits extraction via stereo imaging and multi-view point cloud alignment.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-dimensional reconstruction method for seedlings based on improved DIFIX3D.Plant methods · 2026Article
- 2D-to-3D Image Reconstruction in Agriculture: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and AI-Driven Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- LBD-PointNet++: a point cloud segmentation network for phenotypic trait extraction of broccoli seedlings.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Structure-aware completion of plant 3D LiDAR point clouds via a multi-resolution GAN-inversion network.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate 3D reconstruction is essential for plant phenotyping. However, point clouds generated directly by binocular cameras using single-shot mode often suffer from distortion, while self-occlusion among plant organs complicates complete data acquisition. Methods: To address these challenges, this study proposes and validates an integrated, two-phase plant 3D reconstruction workflow. In the first phase, we bypass the integrated depth estimation module on camera and instead apply Structure from Motion (SfM) and Multi-View Stereo (MVS) techniques to the captured high-resolution images. It produces high-fidelity, single-view point clouds, effectively avoiding distortion and drift. In the second phase, to overcome self-occlusion, we register point clouds from six viewpoints into a complete plant model. This process involves a rapid coarse alignment using a marker-based Self-Registration (SR) method, followed by fine alignment with the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm. Results: The workflow was validated on two Ilex species (Ilex verticillata and Ilex salicina). The results demonstrate the high accuracy and reliability of the workflow. Furthermore, key phenotypic parameters extracted from the models show a strong correlation with manual measurements, with coefficients of determination (R²) exceeding 0.92 for plant height and crown width, and ranging from 0.72 to 0.89 for leaf parameters. Discussion: These findings validate our workflow as an accurate, reliable, and accessible tool for quantitative 3D plant phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.