ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Patterns of plant organ-level non-structural carbohydrate content in response to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response of Non-Structural Carbohydrates inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Edge Effects on Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Organs ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The role of non-structural carbohydrates in tree physiology and forest management: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Stage-dependent shifts in non-structural carbohydrates and C, N stoichiometry inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Nitrogen saturation drives shifts in response patterns of non-structural carbohydrate pools in a meadow steppe after ceasing nitrogen addition.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon is one of the most crucial elements within plants, with its production and supply determining growth behaviors and physiological strategies. Nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) serve as the "currency" of plant carbon flow, playing a key role in the balance between structural growth and carbon storage. However, the response patterns of NSC pools to varying concentrations and durations of nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment remain unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis compiling 1,313 independent data points from four plant organs-leaves, branches, stems, and roots-across global experiments to evaluate the impact of N and P enrichment on NSC pools in different organs. Our findings indicate that N limitation is widespread in ecosystems, whereas P limitation is not. Both the concentration and duration of N enrichment exhibit significant threshold effects on NSCs. Low to moderate levels of N enrichment led to varied increases in soluble sugar content (0.24% to 19.14%) and decreases in starch content (1.22% to 32.35%) in the leaves and branches of woody plants. However, this trend weakened or disappeared at high N concentrations. The NSC content in herbaceous plants was more sensitive to nutrient enrichment, with N enrichment significantly reducing their NSC reserves across all organs (by up to 90.72%). By integrating global data, this study not only addresses the gaps left by individual experiments in elucidating the spatio-temporal threshold responses of NSC to nutrient enrichment but also reveals the scarcity of studies on P addition and of long-term experiments in the existing literature. It reveals the growth-carbon storage strategies of plants under different nutrient conditions, contributing to biodiversity conservation and resource utilization in the context of future nitrogen deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.