ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Divergent Evolutionary Pressures Shape Olfactory Sensitivity of the Maxillary Palps in Tephritidae Fruit Flies.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Divergent Evolutionary Pressures Shape Olfactory Sensitivity of the Maxillary Palps in Tephritidae Fruit Flies.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Olfaction is a rapidly evolving sense. Given its diverse functions, from finding ecological niches to selection of mates, we hypothesized that olfaction is subjected to divergent evolutionary pressures. We compared the olfactory sensitivity of five species of Tephritidae fruit flies to two broad classes of volatiles: general niche-related volatiles (food and fruit odors) and volatiles used in sexual communication (pheromones and "parapheromones"). We then analyzed whether the differential sensitivities across species harbor "signals" of such contrasting evolutionary pressures. As recent studies highlight the maxillary palps as key auxiliary olfactory organs for detecting both classes of volatiles, we focused our sensory analysis on this auxiliary olfactory organ. Using gas chromatography coupled to electropalpographic detection (GC-EPD), we recorded sensory responses from five species with a diverse phylogenetic and ecological separation. Detection overlapped considerably across taxa; however, the maxillary palp exhibited distinct sex and clade-specific patterns in sensitivity to pheromones and parapheromones. Cluster analysis of sensitivities to (para)pheromones aligned strongly with the species' phylogeny. In contrast, cluster analysis of sensitivities to general food and fruit odors clustered separately and showed a strong correlation with ecological niche rather than phylogeny. Clearly, the selection pressures that shape the evolutionary direction of olfactory sensitivity to (para)pheromones and niche-related odors are diametrical opposites, reminiscent of stabilizing versus directional selection. Understanding the detection and evolution of distinct volatile classes provides valuable insights into the evolutionary ecology of olfaction, studies on olfactory receptors, and sensory and preference coding, and supports the rational development of novel lures to manage these pest insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.