ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2025
Interleukin-6 as the preferred prognostic factor in infection-complicated acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the prognostic significance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in predicting infection severity and mortality among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the high susceptibility of AML patients to infectious complications, the study aimed to evaluate IL-6 as a superior biomarker compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 AML patients who developed infectious complications during treatment. Biomarkers, including IL-6, CRP, and PCT, were measured at the onset of infection, and infection severity was graded on a scale from 1 to 5. Statistical me-- thods, including Spearman's rank correlation and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), were applied to determine relationships between biomarker levels, infection severity, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the predictive value of IL-6 for mortality, adjusting for demographic and hematological factors. Results: IL-6 levels exhibited the strongest correlation with infection severity and mortality (odds ratio 2.45, 95% CI: 1.80-3.33) compared to CRP and PCT. The relationship was particularly pronounced in middle-aged patients (41-60 years). While CRP and PCT also increased with infection severity, IL-6 demonstrated superior predictive power, especially in severe and fatal cases. Conclusions: IL-6 is a reliable prognostic biomarker for infection severity and mortality in AML patients, outperforming traditional inflammatory markers. Routine IL-6 monitoring could enable early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating timely interventions and improving outcomes. These findings support the integration of IL-6 monitoring into standard care protocols for AML patients with infectious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.