ReviewContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2025
Molecular insights into proliferation and inflammation in actinic keratosis and photodynamic therapy: a comprehensive review of proliferation and inflammation markers.
Review in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin lesion with the potential to progress into cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Understanding molecular markers involved in AK pathogenesis can aid in assessing disease severity, monitoring treatment response, and identifying patients at risk of malignant transformation. This review examines key biomarkers, including Ki-67, p53, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cyclooxy-genase-2 (COX-2), and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2), focusing on their role in AK progression and response to photodynamic therapy. Ki-67, a proliferation marker, declines following successful AK treatment, making it a useful therapeutic indicator. p53 mutations, common in AK, are linked to disease progression, but post-treatment persistence of mutant cells suggests the need for multiple therapy sessions. MMP-1 and MMP-2 contribute to extracellular matrix remodeling and may serve as markers of treatment efficacy. COX-2, associated with inflammation, is upregulated in AK, but its prognostic significance remains uncertain. MCM2 expression correlates with AK severity and proliferation, yet its role in cSCC progression requires further investigation. These findings highlight the importance of molecular biomarkers in AK diagnosis and treatment monitoring, suggesting that while Ki-67 and MMPs may be valuable therapeutic markers, additional research is needed to fully integrate these biomarkers into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.