ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Evaluating the advancements and efficacies in pharmacological Mpox treatments: a comprehensive review.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox, now known as Mpox, has reemerged as a serious public health threat due to an increasing number of outbreaks outside its primary endemic regions. Although virologically similar to smallpox, smallpox therapy is not specifically approved for Mpox. The goal of this review is to assess the pharmacological progress and therapeutic efficacy of available and new therapies for Mpox. Structured literature review methodology was used based on peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials data and global health agency reports published from 2008 to 2025. Data was collected from ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus and WHO databases with keywords on antiviral pharmacodynamics, resistance mechanism and clinical outcome. Prominent reviewed stewards include tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir: drugs first developed for smallpox but repositioned for Mpox under expanded access programs. Tecovirimat seems most promising, however endangered by emerging resistance mutations. Innovative strategies, including mRNA vaccines, use of nanoparticles for drug delivery and host-directed treatments, are discussed that may improve treatment efficacy and preparedness for outbreaks. The results underscore that combination regimens will be required to counter resistance, there is a need for increased access in low- and middle-income countries, and global health cooperation should be bolstered. The review endorses increased clinical trial capacities, amended regulatory approaches development of new classes of therapeutics as part of global Mpox response efforts. By combining pharmacological breakthroughs with public health readiness, global health communities can be better equipped to respond to Mpox and other possible orthopox outbreaks of the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.