Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098819›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Beyond the surface: untangling molecular complexity in organic residue analysis of coated archaeological ceramics.

Jasmine Lundy, Julia Haas, Birgit Öhlinger, Léa Drieu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasmine LundyDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8250-7697
Julia HaasDepartment of Archaeologies, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Birgit ÖhlingerDepartment of Archaeologies, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Léa DrieuUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, CEPAM, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-4925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed molecular and isotopic signals are readily encountered in organic residue analysis (ORA) of archaeological ceramics, which can impact our ability to identify the contents/use of the vessel. One reason for these mixed signals that is rarely considered is the mixture of organic products used to coat vessels and the organic products that were later contained in the ceramic vessel. Here, we apply a multifaceted ORA approach to experimental cooking vessels that were coated with a range of organic products during post-firing treatment and then used to cook a variety of organic contents. Our results show that the visibility of the coating agent or cooking commodity varies depending on the type of extraction or analytical method applied. We show that it is important to use a combination of extraction methods (acidified methanol and solvent extraction) and that both molecular and isotopic data must be considered. For the first time, we have also shown that thermal transformation markers could reflect the post-firing coating as opposed to cooking. We call on ORA specialists to carefully consider the impact of post-firing coating before interpreting residues from archaeological ceramics and to implement a multifaceted ORA approach to aid their detection.

Indexed as

archaeological ceramicsexperimentalorganic residue analysispost-firing coating

Identifiers

PMID41098819
PMCPMC12520769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.