Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098814›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2025

Application of remote sensing and geospatial technologies in predicting vector-borne disease outbreaks.

Ebrahim Abbasi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ebrahim AbbasiBiology and Control of Disease Vectors, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1861-5321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) pose significant global health threats, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Remote sensing (RS) and geospatial technologies offer valuable tools for monitoring environmental changes and predicting disease transmission patterns, thereby supporting proactive public health interventions. This study reviews the application of RS and geospatial methods in the prediction, monitoring and control of VBDs. A systematic approach was employed to analyse existing literature, focusing on RS platforms such as Landsat, MODIS and Sentinel-2, alongside geographical information systems and machine learning models used for predictive modelling. The review reveals that these technologies play a crucial role in identifying environmental drivers of disease dynamics, including temperature, precipitation and land-use changes. However, challenges remain in terms of data resolution, model generalizability and the integration of socio-economic factors into predictive frameworks. The integration of early warning systems and participatory surveillance is highlighted as a promising avenue for improving disease forecasting. The study emphasizes the need for enhanced data accessibility, cross-sector collaboration and the inclusion of socio-economic variables in future research to improve the scalability and accuracy of disease prediction models.

Indexed as

early warning systemsenvironmental healthgeographical information systems (GIS)geospatial technologiespredictive modellingremote sensingvector-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID41098814
PMCPMC12520778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.