SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Healthy dietary patterns improve sexual function and incontinence symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary patterns and dietary interventions.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) primarily including urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction, significantly impairs individuals' quality of life. While healthy dietary patterns are considered potential modulators, a synthesized understanding of their impact is lacking. Objective: This systematic study aims to assess the effects of various healthy dietary patterns on PFD, providing a scientific basis for developing effective dietary intervention strategies in clinical practice. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase databases. A total of 493 articles were identified across the five evidence-based dietary patterns: DASH, Mediterranean diet, hPDI, anti-inflammatory diet, and pro-inflammatory diet. After screening titles and abstracts, 196 articles were selected for full-text review, and 31 studies met the criteria. Of these, 14 studies provided sufficient quantitative data and were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analyses, including odds ratios (OR) for cross-sectional studies and standardized mean differences (SMD) for prospective studies, were conducted using Review manager version 5.4. Results: This study included 10 prospective studies, 17 cross-sectional studies, and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that recruited diabetic patients, patients with urinary incontinence, and other populations from North America, Europe, Asia, and other regions. The findings showed that healthy dietary patterns significantly improved sexual dysfunction (cross-sectional studies: OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55, 0.85]; prospective studies: SMD = -0.6, 95% CI [-1.02, -0.17]) and incontinence symptoms (cross-sectional studies: OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.68, 0.87]). Specially, the Mediterranean diet and anti-inflammatory dietary patterns were significantly associated with a reduced risk of sexual dysfunction. The DASH diet was effective in alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms and urgency urinary incontinence. Conversely, pro-inflammatory dietary patterns were significantly associated with an increased risk of urinary and fecal incontinence. Conclusion: Healthy, anti-inflammatory dietary patterns, particularly the Mediterranean diet, are associated with significant improvements in Pelvic floor dysfunction, particularly sexual dysfunction and incontinence symptoms. These findings support the integration of dietary counseling into the management of PFD, with a particular focus on patients with co-existing metabolic risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.