ArticleiScience2025
Development and tracking of inferior vena cava diameter after filter placement using a circle-fitting predictive model.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a critical factor in the decision-making process for IVC filter (IVCF) placement. A mismatched filter can compromise its stability and potentially lead to adverse events. This study develops and validates a predictive model using a circle-fitting algorithm to estimate the IVC diameter after filter placement. The findings suggest that single-angle measurements may misrepresent the filter-vessel compatibility, since the IVC transforms from an oval to a near-circular cross-section following filter placement. The predictive model, integrating three-dimensional, multi-angle cavography with circumference-based calculations, demonstrates excellent concordance with both post-placement maximum and minimum diameters in animal and clinical samples. Compared to the conventional single-angle measurements prior to IVCF placement, the predictive diameter can provide a more accurate and reliable representation of the IVC size, which was superior to either the maximum or minimum diameter alone, suggesting a higher predictive reliability. This model may provide a valuable tool for more accurate IVCF diameter selection and support future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.