Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098774›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Multilayer GNN for predictive maintenance and clustering in power grids.

Muhammad Kazim, Harun Pirim, Chau Le, Trung Le, Om Prakash Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad KazimIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, NDSU Department 2485, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.
Harun PirimIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, NDSU Department 2485, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.
Chau LeDepartment of Engineering Technology & Construction Management, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Trung LeDepartment of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Om Prakash YadavDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unplanned power outages create major economic costs. To better predict and manage these events, we present a multilayer graph neural network (GNN) framework that captures spatial, short-term co-occurrence, and statistically enriched co-failure patterns using 7 years of Oklahoma Gas & Electric data from 347 substations. These relations are encoded with weighted graph convolutions and fused by attention into a unified representation. For predictive maintenance, the model flags substations requiring near-term intervention across 30-, 60-, and 180-day horizons, achieving a peak 30-day F1 score of 0.8935. The same representation supports resilience planning by clustering substations into eight risk groups, each with distinct incident rates and recovery times. The highest-risk group has over six times higher incident rates than the low-risk groups. Combining prediction and clustering in a single framework provides utilities with an integrated basis for scheduling maintenance, prioritizing inspections, and targeting grid-hardening investments to minimize outage impacts and enhance reliability.

Indexed as

Applied sciencesArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Identifiers

PMID41098774
PMCPMC12519140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.