ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Breaking the heterogeneity barrier: a robust prognostic signature for survival stratification and immune profiling in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-regional transcriptomics reveals robust consensus subtypes beyond tumor heterogeneity of breast cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Quantitative coupling of clonal CNV evolution and spatially restricted malignant states identifies MFGE8 as a candidate late-state-associated target in breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, poses significant challenges to human health. Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) limits the reliability of conventional prognostic models. Methods: Using multi-region RNA-seq, we quantified TNBC transcriptomic heterogeneity through an integrative heterogeneity score (IHS). After evaluating inter-patient heterogeneity (IPH) and ITH, prognostic and low-heterogeneity genes were identified and used to build a prognostic risk model with a random survival forest (RSF) algorithm. This model was combined with TNM staging into a nomogram for clinical applicability. We further revealed the distinct immune microenvironment features, somatic mutations, and chemotherapy responses between risk subgroups. Gene expression was validated via RT-qPCR. Results: Spatial characterization uncovered substantial ITH, evidenced by sharp shifts in PAM50 subtypes and immune infiltration. Two low-heterogeneity biomarkers, CYP4B1 and GBP1, were identified to develop a robust prognostic signature with consistent predictive performance across 3- to 9-year survival endpoints (AUC > 0.6). The high-risk subgroup exhibited reduced immune infiltration, reduced immune checkpoint molecule expression, and poor immunotherapy response rates. Integration of the risk signature with TNM staging created a clinically practical nomogram with superior predictive accuracy (C-index >0.67). Therapeutic vulnerability profiling identified six targeted agents showing increased efficacy in high-risk patients. Dysregulation of signature genes was demonstrated in two TNBC cell lines. Conclusions: This study established a transcriptomic heterogeneity-resilient prognostic model for TNBC, enabling precise survival stratification and immune microenvironment assessment. The integrative nomogram and risk-guided therapeutic predictions address clinical challenges in TNBC management, advancing personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.