ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Contact load is associated with both contact and non-contact injuries in rugby union.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Characteristics of Training Injuries Among Chinese Competitive Rugby Sevens Players: A Retrospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Managing matches and training loads is crucial for injury prevention. Contact load is a defining feature of rugby union, and World Rugby has proposed its management as a key strategy for the prevention of injuries. In fact, increased contact load has been associated with a higher incidence of injuries. However, the specific relationship between contact load and the occurrence of both contact and non-contact injuries remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to clarify the association between contact load and the occurrence of contact and non-contact injuries in elite rugby union players. Methods: Sixty-six elite male rugby union players (age: 26.5 ± 3.5 years) in Japan were monitored over three seasons. Contact load, an indicator of training load, was evaluated based on collision count and collision load, measured using a global positioning system device. For each player, cumulative contact loads were calculated using time windows of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The association between contact load and injury incidence (contact and non-contact) was analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Results: A total of 193 injuries were recorded. Of these, 136 were contact injuries and 57 were non-contact injuries. The contact load was significantly associated with both types of injury. For contact injuries, the highest odds ratio for the collision count was observed on day 1 and gradually decreased toward day 7 (day 1: odds ratio, 2.10 [95% confidence interval: 1.67-2.64]; day 7: 1.31 [1.15-1.48]). The odds ratio for collision load also declined from days 1-7 (day 1: 3.27 [2.18-4.90]; day 7: 1.44 [1.17-1.78]). By contrast, non-contact injuries showed a different pattern. For collision count, the highest odds ratio was observed on day 2 and then gradually decreased toward day 4 (day 2: 1.38 [1.04-1.83]; day 4: 1.35 [1.06-1.72]). The odds ratio for collision load was also the highest on day 2 and decreased toward day 4 (day 2: 1.75 [1.16-2.65]; day 4: 1.56 [1.07-2.27]). Conclusion: Contact load was associated with both contact and non-contact injuries in elite rugby union players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.