Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098666›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

A novel marker in the ovarian preservation approach to endometrial cancer: systemic immune inflammatory index.

Büşra Şahin, Tansu Bahar Gürbüz, Ayşe Sinem Duru Çöteli, Emel Ebru Begen, Arife Akay, Nurettin Boran, Yaprak Üstün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Büşra ŞahinAnkara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ankara Turkey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-6233
Tansu Bahar GürbüzDuzce Ataturk State Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Duzce Turkey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duzce Ataturk State Hospital, Duzce, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-1044
Ayşe Sinem Duru ÇöteliAnkara Health Science University Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital Department of Gynecological Oncology Ankara Turkey Department of Gynecological Oncology, Ankara Health Science University Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6558-7549
Emel Ebru BegenAnkara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ankara Turkey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-3334
Arife AkayAnkara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ankara Turkey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-2714
Nurettin BoranAnkara Health Science University Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital Department of Gynecological Oncology Ankara Turkey Department of Gynecological Oncology, Ankara Health Science University Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-5551
Yaprak ÜstünAnkara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ankara Turkey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-3848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to to evaluate the frequency of ovarian involvement in endometrial cancer patients aged 50 years and younger, identify associated clinicopathological factors, and uniquely assess the role of the Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII) in predicting ovarian involvement. Methods: Patients aged 50 years and younger diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 1992 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Two groups were formed based on adnexal involvement: those with (ovarian metastasis or synchronous ovarian cancer) and without adnexal involvement. Clinicopathological predictors of adnexal involvement were evaluated. Preoperative complete blood count values (platelet, leukocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts) were used to calculate inflammatory indices: PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and SII (neutrophil × platelet / lymphocyte). A two-group analysis was performed based on the cut-off values of statistically significant parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Among 205 patients, histopathological ovarian metastasis was identified in 5.9% (n=12), and synchronous ovarian tumors in 2.4% (n=5). Significant differences were observed in neutrophil counts, NLR, and SII values between the groups (p<0.05). ROC analysis showed the optimal SII cut-off value as 992.58, with 70% sensitivity and 76% specificity (AUC=0.726). Ovarian involvement was significantly more frequent in patients with SII ≥ 992 (p<0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical stromal invasion, lymph node metastasis, omental involvement, grade of tumor, NLR and SII were significantly associated with ovarian involvement (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified histological grade, myometrial invasion, pelvic lymph node metastasis and SII as independent risk factors (p<0.05). Conclusion: Ovarian involvement is uncommon in patients under 50 years of age with low-grade tumors, absence of myometrial invasion, negative pelvic lymph nodes, and preoperative SII < 992.58. Ovarian-sparing surgery may be a safe option in selected cases, and SII could serve as a valuable index in guiding ovarian preservation decisions.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFertility PreservationOrgan Sparing TreatmentsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansInflammationMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBlood plateletsEndometrial neoplasmsLeukocytesNeutrophilsOrgan preservationOvarian neoplasmsSystemic immune inflammatory index

Identifiers

PMID41098666
PMCPMC12520731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.