Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098649›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025

Large language models in real-world clinical workflows: a systematic review of applications and implementation.

Yaara Artsi, Vera Sorin, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Girish N Nadkarni, Eyal Klang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. From Model to Product: Understanding and Teaching AI Evidence.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  8. [Application effect of LLMs as decision-support tools in emergency burn treatment].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Article
  9. Large language models for tympanostomy patient education: readability and guideline adherence.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaara ArtsiAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.
Vera SorinDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Benjamin S GlicksbergThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Panagiotis KorfiatisDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Girish N NadkarniThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Eyal KlangThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) offer promise for enhancing clinical care by automating documentation, supporting decision-making, and improving communication. However, their integration into real-world healthcare workflows remains limited and under characterized. This systematic review aims to evaluate the literature on real-world implementation of LLMs in clinical workflows, including their use cases, clinical settings, observed outcomes, and challenges. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2015 and April 2025 that assessed LLMs in real-world clinical applications. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed, full-text studies in English reporting empirical implementation of LLMs in clinical settings. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the PROBAST tool. Results: Four studies published between 2024 and 2025 met inclusion criteria. All used generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs). Reported applications included outpatient communication, mental health support, inbox message drafting, and clinical data extraction. LLM deployment was associated with improvements in operational efficiency, user satisfaction, and reduced workload. However, challenges included performance variability across data types, limitations in generalizability, regulatory delays, and lack of post-deployment monitoring. Conclusions: Early evidence suggests that LLMs can enhance clinical workflows, but real-world adoption remains constrained by systemic, technical, and regulatory barriers. To support safe and scalable use, future efforts should prioritize standardized evaluation metrics, multi-site validation, human oversight, and implementation frameworks tailored to clinical settings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/recorddashboard, PROSPERO CRD420251030069.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical implementationhealthcare workflowslarge language modelsreal-world application

Identifiers

PMID41098649
PMCPMC12519456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.