ArticleACS ES&T air2025
Differential
Article in ACS ES&T air, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating the Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Temporal variation in markers of immune signaling and wound repair in primary human airway epithelial cells following acute versus repeated woodsmoke condensate exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of the fuel moisture content and photochemical aging on the toxicity of smoke particulate matter (PM) emissions in simulated wildland fires. We burned fuel beds consisting of surface fuels and duff under moderate and low moisture contents, representative of prescribed fires (Rx) and drought-induced wildfires (Wild), respectively. The Wild emissions were photochemically aged in an oxidation flow reactor (Wild-Aged). We exposed human bronchial epithelial cells to PM extracts from each permutation. PM extracts from all experimental permutations (Rx, Wild, Wild-Aged) induced oxidative stress, evidenced by a significant increase in 8-isoprostane concentration in the cell media compared to control. However, the increase of 8-isoprostane was significantly less in Wild-Aged compared to that in Wild and Rx, indicating loss of oxidative potential due to photochemical aging. Based on the release of lactate dehydrogenase in the cell media, the level of lipid peroxidation, and the magnitude of gene fold-changes, Rx PM extracts were more toxic than Wild. Chemical composition analysis suggests that toxicity was driven by levels of aromatic species in the PM, which were highest in Rx, followed by Wild and Wild-Aged. Overall, these results highlight the complex dependence of the toxicity of wildland-fire smoke on combustion conditions and atmospheric processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.