Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098618›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance using multiple instance learning.

Filip Winzell, Ida Arvidsson, Kalle Åström, Niels Christian Overgaard, Felicia-Elena Marginean, Athanasios Simoulis, Anders Bjartell, Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, Anders Heyden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Filip WinzellLund University, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3725-2871
Ida ArvidssonLund University, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6065-8639
Kalle ÅströmLund University, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.
Niels Christian OvergaardLund University, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-0741
Felicia-Elena MargineanSkåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Athanasios SimoulisLund University, Division of Urological Cancers, Dept. of Translational Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
Anders BjartellLund University, Division of Urological Cancers, Dept. of Translational Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-3786
Agnieszka KrzyzanowskaLund University, Division of Urological Cancers, Dept. of Translational Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-7054
Anders HeydenLund University, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-355X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To avoid over-treatment of prostate cancer patients following screening for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, keeping patients on active surveillance has been suggested as an alternative to radical treatment. This means recurring visits for patients with low-grade cancer to monitor progression. Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model that can identify high-risk patients in a cohort of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Approach: We have developed a multiple instance learning-based framework for predicting the longitudinal outcomes for prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Our models were trained only on whole-slide images with patient-level labels without using explicit Gleason grades. We employed the UNI-2 foundation model and the well-established attention-based multiple instance learning approach. We further evaluated our models by fitting Cox proportional hazards models and testing them on an external dataset. Results: With this approach, we achieved an average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.957 to 0.959). Fitting Cox models to the predicted probabilities achieved a Conclusion: We show that avoiding Gleason grades is beneficial for longitudinal outcome prediction of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that benign prostate tissue contains prognostic information. However, before our models could be used clinically, much more work remains to improve the generalization.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdigital pathologymultiple instance learningpatient outcomeprostate cancerwhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID41098618
PMCPMC12518054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.