Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098603›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025

Anatomic Variation with Supine to Prone Positioning: Implications for Prone Transpsoas Single-Position Lumbar Fusion.

Andy Ton, William J Karakash, Henry Avetisian, Marc Abdou, Brandon Gettleman, Ryan Palmer, Emily S Mills, Jacob R Ball, Jonathan Ragheb, Jeffrey C Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andy TonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, USA.
William J KarakashDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Henry AvetisianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Marc AbdouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Brandon GettlemanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Ryan PalmerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Emily S MillsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Jacob R BallDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Jonathan RaghebDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Jeffrey C WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Raymond J HahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Ram K AlluriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prone transpsoas (PTP) approach is a novel, single-position lumbar fusion technique that enables lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) entirely in the prone position, allowing simultaneous access to both the anterior and posterior spinal columns. While it offers advantages such as achieving circumferential fusion without repositioning the patient, it also presents challenges, including hemodynamic shifts, pressure-related complications, and technical difficulties in navigating complex anatomical structures. This study describes anatomical shifts relative to the lumbar spine when transitioning from the supine to the prone position. Methods: This retrospective review included patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion between 2018 and 2024 and had both preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative prone computed tomography-guided imaging. Patients with deformity, infection, trauma, prior fusion, or malignancy were excluded. Anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) distances (in mm) were measured on axial slices using reference lines aligned to vertebral endplates at each lumbar level. Measurements included AP and ML distances to the abdominal great vessels, psoas major, and intervertebral discs. Dependent samples t-tests and analysis of variance were used to assess anatomical shifts from supine to prone and to compare segmental differences. Results: Among the 74 patients (47% female), the mean age was 62.7±12.2 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.8±5.8 kg/m Conclusions: Prone positioning induces measurable anterior translation of both the psoas major muscle and great vessels, potentially altering the operative corridor utilized in the PTP approach. These discrepancies between supine MRI and prone intraoperative anatomy emphasize the need to account for positional anatomical changes to minimize neurovascular risk during PTP LLIF.

Indexed as

anatomic variationlumbar fusionminimally invasive surgerypatient positioningsingle-position surgerytranspsoas approach

Identifiers

PMID41098603
PMCPMC12519110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.