Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098599›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Transition from Conservative Therapy to Surgical Intervention in Older Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury: A Nationwide Retrospective Study.

Noriaki Yokogawa, Takeshi Sasagawa, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Satoru Demura, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Kota Watanabe, Satoshi Nori, Toru Funayama, Fumihiko Eto and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Kawamoto et al.Spine surgery and related research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Noriaki YokogawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takeshi SasagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hiroyuki HayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Satoru DemuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hiroaki NakashimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoki SegiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kota WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi NoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru FunayamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Fumihiko EtoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Higashiibaraki, Japan.
Hideaki NakajimaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Takeo FuruyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Atsushi YundeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshinori TerashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ryosuke HirotaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tomohiro YamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Tomohiko HasegawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yasuaki ImajoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Kenichi KawaguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yohei HarutaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hitoshi TonomuraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Munehiro SakataDepartment of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidetomi TeraiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TamaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Gen InoueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Shota IkegamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Koji AkedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Kazuo NakanishiDepartment of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Spine Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Hiroshi UeiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruki FunaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Yasushi OshimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ko HashimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoichi IizukaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Katsuhito KiyasuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Masayuki IshiharaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan.
Takashi KaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi KatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury is increasing among older adults, particularly in aging societies like Japan. The optimal treatment strategies remain unclear, with conservative therapy often preferred, especially for older patients. However, surgery is frequently necessary due to poor improvement or progression of paralysis during conservative treatment. This study investigated the characteristics and outcomes of older patients with CSCI without major bone injury who transitioned from conservative treatment to surgery. Methods: This nationwide, retrospective study examined data from patients aged ≥65 years with CSCI without major bone injury. The patients were categorized into 3 groups: conservative treatment, planned surgery, and those who switched from conservative treatment to surgery. The study aimed to identify the risk factors for conservative therapy failure that necessitate surgical intervention and to compare the outcomes between patients who had planned surgery and those who required surgery after conservative management failed. Results: Among 615 patients, 422 (68.6%) received conservative treatment, 193 (31.4%) had planned surgery, and 116 (18.9%) transitioned from conservative to surgical treatment. Transition to surgery was mainly due to poor improvement or progression of neurological deficits. Significant risk factors for transitioning to surgery included younger age, presence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and spinal cord signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging. Comparative analysis showed no significant differences in neurological outcomes between patients who had surgery as planned and those who required surgery after failed conservative treatment. Conclusions: A significant proportion of older patients with CSCI without major bone injury who were initially managed conservatively eventually required surgery due to insufficient neurological improvement. The outcomes of patients who transitioned to surgery were similar to those who had surgery as initially planned, indicating that careful monitoring of conservative treatment followed by surgery, if necessary, may be an effective approach.

Indexed as

advanced agecervical spinal cord injury without major bone injuryretrospective multi-center studytransition from conservative to surgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID41098599
PMCPMC12519107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.