ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Intranasal Sertraline for the Investigation of Nose-to-Brain Delivery to Mitigate Systemic Exposure.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antenatal depression, or depression during pregnancy, is a common psychiatric disorder and poses significant risks to both the mother and the fetus. Despite these risks, it is frequently left untreated due to fears of side effects caused by antidepressant medications which cross through the placental barrier. It is therefore desirable to develop formulation strategies to mitigate systemic exposure to psychotropics while maintaining their efficacy. In this work, we develop formulations of sertraline, a common antidepressant, to target delivery to the brain through intranasal administration. Formulation engineering enables successful solubilization of sertraline at high concentrations over months at room temperature. Using mice, we compare sertraline biodistribution following intranasal administration and standard oral administration. Intranasal administration of our candidate formulation provides comparable brain exposure at half the dose compared to oral treatment and lowers the maximum plasma exposure. These findings suggest that intranasal administration may provide selectivity for drug exposure in the central nervous system over systemic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.