SynthesisTransboundary and emerging diseases2025
Burden of Bovine Tuberculosis on Animal Health, Welfare and Production: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Global Prevalence of Tuberculosis Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Epidemiological investigation ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Improving Bovine Tuberculosis Surveillance Through Risk-Based Prioritization of Slaughterhouse-Triggered Trace-Back Investigations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Veterinary-sanitary evaluation and biochemical quality of beef from cattle with chronic infectious diseases: Impact of chronic brucellosis on nutritional composition.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Zoonotic Tuberculosis as a One Health Challenge: Global Evidence, Transmission Dynamics, and Policy Gaps in Indonesia.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring alternative cytokines as potential biomarkers forFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing evidence-based approaches to combat infectious diseases is essential in resource-limited settings to enable prioritisation of interventions where they are most effective in reducing the burden of disease. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a major disease in cattle, but its impact remains poorly characterised in many contexts and production systems. To support the development of policies for accelerated bTB control, we conducted a systematic review to collate the available evidence on the impact of bTB on animal health, welfare and production. We identified 91 eligible studies providing information on the burden of bTB. Although the study suggested that bTB poses a considerable burden, the data were sparse and occasionally contradictory. A large proportion (87%) of bTB-positive animals were asymptomatic, meaning infected animals could go undetected in the absence of routine surveillance and contribute to silent spread of infection. Almost half (46%) of bTB-positive bovines exhibited visible lesions on post-mortem inspection, and the carcase would be considered, in part or entirely, unfit for human consumption. However, due to the limited and sometimes conflicting evidence, the true burden in endemic herds and various settings remains poorly understood. The study highlights the paucity of the kind of detailed evidence that is essential for evaluating the benefit of any disease intervention and underscores the importance of considering the distribution of outcomes when supporting data are scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.