Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Nefazodone shortage in the United States: analysis of drug switching and utilization.

Ashley Tabah, Julia Fox, Clayton English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley TabahThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Julia FoxThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Clayton EnglishThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medication shortages and manufacturer discontinuations of antidepressants place patients in vulnerable scenarios if medications become inaccessible, leaving prescribers to alter therapy without guarantee of a sustained response to the new treatment. Methods: We conducted a descriptive retrospective analysis to explore changes in drug utilization and switching patterns following an FDA-declared nefazodone shortage in the United States. Using the Komodo Healthcare Map®, we analyzed prescribing patterns across the pre-shortage, shortage, and post-shortage periods. Results: A total of 7891 individuals were selected for inclusion, with 2185 eligible for the switching outcomes. A majority (96.4%) switched to an alternative medication, with an average time to switch of 106.8 days (SD: 81.7). Few patients resumed nefazodone use post-shortage (7.3%). Discussion: Although most patients transitioned to alternative antidepressants during the shortage, the need for treatment changes and the low rate of returning to the original medication may reflect challenges to patient-centered care. There is a need for clearer prescriber guidance to better support clinical decision-making during medication shortages.

Indexed as

claims analysisdrug shortagemental healthnefazodonepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID41098516
PMCPMC12518329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.