Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Relationships among discrimination, cognitive-affective pain amplifiers, and identification with Native American culture: results from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk.

Brandon W Jones, Hayden M Ventresca, Taylor V Brown, Parker A Kell, Kayla N Trevino, Joanna O Shadlow, Jamie L Rhudy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brandon W JonesTobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Hayden M VentrescaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Taylor V BrownTobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Parker A KellTobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Kayla N TrevinoTobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Joanna O ShadlowDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Jamie L RhudyTobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Native Americans (NAs) experience higher rates of chronic pain than other U.S. ethnic/racial groups. This may be partly caused by stress from interpersonal discrimination, which promotes pain-related catastrophizing and anxiety, cognitive-emotional processes that amplify pain. Greater identification with NA culture has been shown to buffer against negative health outcomes for NA communities, therefore the present study examined whether greater identification with NA culture buffers against the harmful effects of discrimination on pain-related anxiety and catastrophizing. Material and Methods: Participants were 153 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs enrolled in the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Identification with NA culture was assessed by the Native American Acculturation Scale (NAAS), which was reversed scored so that higher scores=greater identification. Interpersonal discrimination was assessed by the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Following laboratory pain tasks, situational pain catastrophizing was assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and pain-related anxiety was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: A significant interaction was found between discrimination and identification with NA culture when predicting pain catastrophizing (ΔR Conclusions: These findings suggest that the relationship between discrimination and pain catastrophizing is stronger for NAs who identify more strongly with NA culture, an effect that is likely due to these individuals having greater overall exposure to discrimination. Alternatively, the NAAS may not capture the full range of cultural processes that buffer against negative health outcomes for NAs. Future research should examine other facets of cultural resilience.

Indexed as

cultural identificationethnic differencesinterpersonal discriminationNative Americanspain anxietypain catastrophizing

Identifiers

PMID41098513
PMCPMC12518361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.