ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Psychometrics of a Persian patient-centered care scale for chronic diseases.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the global prevalence of chronic diseases increasing, healthcare systems designed primarily for acute conditions face challenges. It is indicated that patient-centered care can effectively manage chronic diseases, potentially improving health outcomes. The authors aimed to develop, assess, and validate a scale to measure patient-centered care in chronic disease services within hospitals. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This study was cross-sectional in nature, carried out in 2023 within a sample of hospitals in Shiraz, a city in the southwestern region of Iran. To ensure the questionnaire's validity and reliability, the authors utilized a variety of methods, including face, content, and construct validity, as well as a reliability assessment. The construct validity and questionnaire reliability were confirmed using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. An exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were utilized to conduct the psychometrics.
resultsThe item construction stage resulted in an initial questionnaire comprising a total of 70 individual items. Following the completion of the face and content validity assessment, seven items were removed due to not meeting the required validity criteria. The remaining questionnaire items had an average impact score of 3.25. Additionally, the content validity ratio (CVR) was 0.51, and the content validity index (CVI) was 0.96. The exploratory factor analysis yielded 12 constructs, which accounted for 63.873% of the variance, with an average factor loading value of 0.646. The final questionnaire comprised 57 items with a 6-point Likert scale. The reliability assessment revealed that the questionnaire had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.938 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.936 in total.
conclusionsThis study developed a robust measure for evaluating patient-centered care in inpatient services for chronic diseases. The findings can inform future research and policy development. Future researchers conducting analogous studies utilizing comparable methodologies in various regions of Iran have the potential to elevate the precision and comprehensiveness of the implications derived for the beneficiaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.