ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Prevalence and determinants of menstrual abnormalities among postgraduate students using structural equation model.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn India, the prevalence of menstrual abnormalities is alarmingly high, ranging from 85% to 93.4%, according to documented studies. A significant proportion, of these women fall within the age group of 20-29 years, which includes postgraduate students. This underscores the critical importance of identifying and effectively managing the underlying causes of menstrual abnormalities. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study involved 272 postgraduate female students from Mangalore University, Karnataka state, India selected through stratified sampling. A questionnaire collected data on the age of menarche, menstrual abnormalities, BMI, hormonal imbalances or thyroid conditions, menstrual cycle characteristics and symptoms, lifestyle and dietary habits, physical health, perceived stress levels, economic factors, attitudes towards menstrual health, and knowledge and behaviors related to menstrual health. The study used a Structural Equation Model (SEM) to evaluate the effects of risk factors on menstrual disorders and developed machine learning models to accurately predict different types of these disorders.
resultsThe study found that 78% of PG students experienced menstrual abnormalities, with dysmenorrhea being the most common at 24.26%. The SEM model identifies lifestyle, perceived stress, physical health, and practice as significant risk factors for menstrual abnormalities. Mediation analysis reveals that attitude, economic factors, and practice play crucial roles in influencing menstrual abnormalities. The SEM-based classification model outperforms popular machine learning models, achieving an accuracy of 84.56%.
conclusionReducing stress and promoting healthy habits are key to managing menstrual abnormalities. Targeted interventions can improve menstrual health, benefiting students' academic performance, self-esteem, and long-term health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.