ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Prenatal prognostics: Validating high-risk pregnancy predictions for maternal and perinatal outcomes.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preeclampsia Among Pregnant Women Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Taiz City: Insights from a Conflict-Stricken Setting in Southwest Yemen.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-risk pregnancies pose significant challenges to maternal and perinatal health, necessitating effective identification and management strategies. The development of reliable prediction tools is critical for early intervention and improving outcomes in this vulnerable population to identify high-risk pregnancy and assess its maternal and perinatal outcome. MATERIAL AND
methodsIt is a prospective cross-sectional research design. A non-probability convenience sampling was used to collect 300 samples who met the inclusion criteria. The data were collected from antenatal mothers who were visiting selected primary health centers (PHCs) demographic, obstetric data collected, and a scoring system of high-risk pregnancies were used. Data analysis was performed by using one-way ANOVA and logistic regression.
resultsA total of 58% of antenatal mothers were at extremely high risk of pregnancy. By using one-way ANOVA for regression analysis, a statistically significant variation was found between regression and residual (
conclusionThis study establishes the significance of prenatal prediction in identifying high-risk pregnancies and offering a valuable tool for maternal and perinatal risk assessment. The findings underscore the potential for prenatal care strategies to mitigate the risk associated with high-risk pregnancies and contribute to enhanced overall prenatal and perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.