Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098426›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Summation of Approaches and Principles in Occipital Scalp Reconstruction: A Case Report and Literature Review.

James C Yuen, Helen Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James C YuenFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Helen JeonCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complex scalp defects present unique reconstructive challenges owing to limited tissue availability, reduced pliability, and positional difficulties. Although scalp reconstruction techniques are well documented, literature specifically addressing occipital defects is limited. This study reviewed the reconstructive strategies for occipital scalp defects and presented a case report. Methods: A scoping literature review was conducted using PubMed and Ovid to identify studies on occipital scalp reconstructions. Additionally, we present a case of a 78-year-old man with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the left occipital scalp. After wide local excision with clear margins, the patient underwent a staged reconstructive approach involving wound size reduction with adjacent tissue transfer and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), followed by a local rotation flap with V-Y advancement. Results: Initial defect management involved burring the exposed occipital bone to promote vascularization, partial closure with adjacent tissue advancement, and NPWT application. Eleven weeks later, a proximally based pentagonal rotational flap was performed with V-Y advancement for donor-site closure. The patient remained well healed at 17 months of follow-up without complications. Our literature review identified 23 publications describing various techniques for reconstructing occipital defects. No review articles focusing on occipital scalp defects were identified. Conclusions: Occipital scalp reconstruction requires tailored strategies that consider anatomical, wound-, and patient-specific factors. This case highlighted a successful staged approach for optimizing adjacent tissue transfer while minimizing surgical morbidities. Given the limited literature on occipital-specific scalp reconstruction, further studies are required to establish the best practices for managing occipital scalp defects.

Identifiers

PMID41098426
PMCPMC12520219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.