ArticleNutrition research and practice2025
Pattern of dietary and supplemental vitamin C intake according to the level of fruit and vegetable consumption.
Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study examined whether the intake pattern of dietary and supplementary vitamin C differs according to the sufficiency of fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and assessed the risk of vitamin C insufficiency according to FV sufficiency and vitamin C supplement use. SUBJECTS/
methodsData from 10,464 adults aged ≥ 19 yrs from the 2019-2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were analyzed. The participants were categorized into an FV-sufficiency (FVS; ≥ 500 g/day) and FV-insufficiency (FVINS; < 500 g/day) groups. The vitamin C intake from diet, supplements, and major food sources was examined.
resultsApproximately 19.6% of young adults, 41.5% of middle-aged adults, and 39.6% of older adults met the recommended intake of FV. Most participants in the FVS group consumed more than 90 mg of dietary vitamin C (90% of the recommended nutrient intake [RNI]), whereas most in the FVINS group consumed less than 50 mg (50% of the RNI). Even among the FVS group, the proportion meeting the RNI ranged from 27% to 37%. In the FVINS group with adequate vitamin C intake, vitamin C was derived predominantly from sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice products, and meat. The participants who took vitamin C supplements had a lower risk of vitamin C insufficiency than non-users, regardless of the FV intake status.
conclusionAlthough the prevalence of vitamin C insufficiency was high, regardless of FV sufficiency, supplementation allowed the FVS and FVINS groups to meet the recommended levels. Nevertheless, the quality of dietary sources remains a concern, with a reliance on less healthy options such as sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice products, particularly among young adults. These findings highlight the importance of promoting natural food sources like FV for better diet quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.