ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Evaluating the impact of task-sequencing on cognitive and motor performance in MS: PASAT and 3-minute walk test order effects.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The relationship between motor and cognitive performance and cortical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive-motor functioning in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) may be studied effectively by means of dual-task paradigms, under which potential impairments may become more salient. However, the influence of task sequencing, i.e., the order in which a cognitive or motor task is administered prior to the dual-task condition remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate potential task-sequencing effects, as reflected in fatigue or learning effects across single- and dual-task conditions. Methods: A total of 152 PwMS with an average EDSS of 2.3 were quasi-randomly assigned to six groups. The groups differed in the sequence in which a single-motor-task (3-min-25-foot-walk) and a single-cognitive-task (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, PASAT) as well as a dual-task combining both were administered. Gait parameters were measured using an IMU sensor. Statistical analyses compared single- and dual-task performance depending on task-sequencing. Results: Task-sequencing did not affect cognitive or motor performance during the dual-task condition. However, a significant improvement in PASAT scores was observed between the first and second single-task trials, indicating a learning effect. No significant fatigue effects were found in gait parameters between repeated single-task trials. Discussion: The findings suggest that the sequence of task administration does not significantly influence dual-task performance in the subgroup of PwMS focused on in the current work. Merely repeated single-task use of the PASAT leads to cognitive performance improvements, likely due to learning effects. These results indicate that, in clinical settings, test order may be of minor importance for dual-task conditions, if administered according to the procedure used in the current work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.