ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for traumatic adult femoral shaft fractures in low-and-middle-income countries; a systematic review.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review reports on the radiologic and functional outcomes and complications of managing adult traumatic femur shaft fractures (FSFs) with intramedullary nailing (IMN) in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) and evaluates the quality of existing evidence. Methodology: A thorough literature search was conducted across several databases, including reference lists of selected articles. Screening was done per the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2011 and December 2022 that reported radiologic or functional outcomes in adults with isolated traumatic FSFs managed with IMN in LMICs were included for review. The quality and level of evidence were assessed using modified Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklists and the modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Findings: Forty studies from 13 LMICs were included in this review. The mean time to union was 15.4 weeks, with a mean union rate of 88.1%. Functional outcomes scores showed >70% excellent outcomes. The Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia score and Thoresen criteria were the most used assessment tools. Mean infection rates were 4.8%, and limb shortening (of varying amounts) occurred in 3.5% of patients. The findings revealed variability in measuring and reporting IMN outcomes in FSFs, but overall, the existing evidence was of satisfactory quality. Conclusion: Despite the data limitations, methodological differences, and outcome discrepancies, this review demonstrates a trend favoring IMN for FSFs, with low failure rates in low-resources settings. However, more robust studies using standardized radiographic and functional outcomes measures in LMICs are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.