ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Unstable pelvic fractures in patients with hemodynamic instability: global treatment controversies.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safe definitive surgery in unstable pelvic ring injuries - a retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic fractures associated with hemodynamic instability present a major challenge in trauma care, carrying mortality rates up to 30%. Successful management requires a multidisciplinary approach focused on resuscitation, mechanical stabilization, and hemorrhage control. Based on the 2024 International Orthopaedic Trauma Association (IOTA) Annual Meeting Pelvic Symposium, this review summarizes current recommendations for the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Initial skeletal stabilization typically involves noninvasive pelvic binding devices, such as sheets or commercially available binders, employed in both pre-hospital and hospital settings. Subsequent resuscitation strategies include hypotensive resuscitation-restricting fluid administration to maintain lower blood pressure until bleeding is controlled-and damage control resuscitation-consisting of rapid surgical interventions aimed at achieving hemostasis. Current best practice also includes early empirical administration of balanced transfusion products guided by massive transfusion protocols, with targeted adjustments based on point-of-care testing results. Hemorrhage control methods vary depending on available resources: angioembolization effectively manages arterial bleeding in well-resourced facilities, whereas preperitoneal pelvic packing offers a quick, accessible solution for venous and bone-related hemorrhage, particularly in low-resource environments. Although the timing of pelvic binder removal and definitive invasive skeletal stabilization remains controversial, recent evidence supports early definitive internal fixation within 24 hours post-injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.