ArticleChina CDC weekly2025
Surveillance and Analysis of Animal Rabies - China, 2004-2024.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metavirome Analysis of Viruses Carried by Dairy Cows in Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Characteristics of Human Rabies in Chongqing, China, 2016-2024.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Clinic-based characteristics of animal-related injury presentations in Hangzhou, China: a 10-year retrospective analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From one-size-fits-all to context-specific: the 10-day observation rule-a need for change.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Let's Act Now to Make Rabies History.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rabies is a zoonotic disease caused by rabies viruses(RABV). China is a high-risk country for rabies. To address China's rabies situation, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs issued the National Animal Disease Surveillance and Epidemiological Investigation Plan. This study systematically summarized animal rabies surveillance data from the past two decades based on the Program. Methods: Suspected rabies cases collected through the Program between 2004 and 2024 underwent confirmatory diagnosis at the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for animal rabies using national standard protocols: direct fluorescent antibody testing (FAT) and real-time RT-PCR. Epidemiological data from confirmed cases were analyzed using Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping and statistical evaluation methods. Results: Laboratory diagnosis confirmed 331 of 433 suspected cases (76.44%) as rabies-positive. These confirmed cases originated from 15 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) and revealed two distinct transmission patterns: a) dog-mediated rabies, accounting for 47.13% of cases and predominantly endemic in southern PLADs, where it poses ongoing human exposure risks; and b) wildlife-mediated rabies in livestock, comprising 52.87% of cases and primarily transmitted by foxes in northern PLADs, with the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR) experiencing the highest burden. Conclusions: This nationwide surveillance has elucidated current rabies transmission dynamics across China, revealing persistent threats from dog rabies to human health in southern PLADs and emerging threats from wildlife-mediated rabies to livestock in northern border regions. These findings underscore the critical need for enhanced surveillance systems and targeted vaccination strategies addressing both domestic dog populations and wildlife reservoirs to achieve effective rabies control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.