ArticleNursing research and practice2025
Perspectives and Experts of Human Resource Management in Nursing During Disasters and Emergencies: A Qualitative Content Analysis.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disaster Preparedness and Response Competencies Among Nurses in Disaster-Affected Hospital: An Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disasters create an environment characterized by chaos and uncertainty, often leaving nurses feeling unsupported by their management. Despite this, nurses play a crucial role in the healthcare system's response during such crises. Therefore, this study aims to explore the perspectives of experts on human resource management in nursing during disasters and emergencies. Methods: This study employed a conventional qualitative content analysis design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 21 experts and disaster managers in Iran between February and April 2025. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded with participants' consent, transcribed verbatim into Word documents, and imported into MAXQDA software (Version 2020) for systematic organization and analysis. The data were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman's (2020) qualitative content analysis method. Results: The analysis of the findings resulted in one main theme, poor nursing human resource management in disasters, and five subthemes, ineffective command process, passive presence and withdrawal, ineffective employment of volunteer nursing, insufficient attention to safety, and insufficient reinforcement of motivation. Conclusion: Given our ongoing observations of nurses' capabilities during disasters and emergencies, it is expected that the results of this study will aid planners, policymakers, and health sector managers in effectively allocating nursing manpower in potential future disasters. This will improve the quality of services offered to injured individuals and their families during such events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.