ArticleAnnual review of environment and resources2021
Forest Restoration in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Article in Annual review of environment and resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urban tree canopy fragmentation and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Global literature review and survey of implementation constraints on natural climate solutions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Smart wastewater management in hydro-technical systems using digital twin technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pharmacological and Medicinal Properties of the South American Medicinal PlantLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evidence on scaling forest restoration from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Persistent Effects of Landscape Context on Recruitment Dynamics During Secondary Succession of Tropical Forests.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Mixed success for carbon payments and subsidies in support of forest restoration in the neotropics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Abandoned land: Overestimated potential.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Quantifying the Effect Size of Management Actions on Aboveground Carbon Stocks in Forest Plantations.Current forestry reports · 2023Review
- Rates and drivers of aboveground carbon accumulation in global monoculture plantation forests.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Redefining "abandoned" agricultural land in the context of reforestation.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A series of international initiatives have set ambitious goals for restoring global forests. This review synthesizes natural and social science research on forest restoration (FR), with a focus on restoration on cleared land in low- and middle-income countries. We define restoration more broadly than reestablishing native forests, given that landholders might prefer other forest types. We organize the review loosely around ideas in the forest transition literature. We begin by examining recent trends in FR and forest transition indicators. We then investigate two primary parts of the forest transition explanation for forest recovery: wood scarcity, including its connection to restoration for climate change mitigation, and the dynamic relationships between migration and land use. Next, we review ecological and silvicultural aspects of restoration on cleared land. We conclude by discussing selected interventions to promote restoration and the challenge of scaling up restoration to achieve international initiatives' goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.