Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098304›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025

Black US women share their experiences with follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.

Ariel Washington, Kassidy F Houck, Bridget W Nelson, Diane M Harper

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ariel WashingtonDepartment of Oncology, Population Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kassidy F HouckDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bridget W NelsonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Diane M HarperDepartments of Family Medicine, Obstetrics&Gynecology and Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Black women have both high screening and high cancer rates, indicating a lack of appropriate follow-up after an abnormal screening. Our mixed methods study explores the experiences of Black women who had abnormal cervical cancer screening results in Michigan. Study design: Sequential mixed-method study design. Methods: We identified a random group of 72 Black women with recent abnormal screening results requiring colposcopy follow-up from the aggregated local healthcare systems and invited them to participate. We designed a quantitative survey based on validated national health survey modules and a qualitative interview structured on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which was analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis (ATA). We calculated each person's social deprivation index (SDI) based on quantitative results. Results: Fourteen women completed the survey and interview. Five, seven, and two women chose no colposcopy, appropriate colposcopy, and missed colposcopy, but returned for close interval surveillance, respectively. The qualitative themes provided a potent emerging theme: the eternal cycle of human papillomavirus (HPV) uncertainty, which provided context for the other identified themes centered around lack of knowledge leading to emotional burdens, which intersected with being seen as a Black woman. We found similar barriers that have been noted for screening, such as relationships, positive and negative, having some influence on follow-up behavior. Conclusions: With the shift to primary HPV screening, new educational platforms must be created and tailored to explain the HPV cycle for each racial/ethnic community. Precis: The lack of knowledge about the eternal cycle of HPV uncertainty leads to Black women's lack of colposcopy follow-up.

Identifiers

PMID41098304
PMCPMC12519130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.