ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Black US women share their experiences with follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Black women have both high screening and high cancer rates, indicating a lack of appropriate follow-up after an abnormal screening. Our mixed methods study explores the experiences of Black women who had abnormal cervical cancer screening results in Michigan. Study design: Sequential mixed-method study design. Methods: We identified a random group of 72 Black women with recent abnormal screening results requiring colposcopy follow-up from the aggregated local healthcare systems and invited them to participate. We designed a quantitative survey based on validated national health survey modules and a qualitative interview structured on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which was analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis (ATA). We calculated each person's social deprivation index (SDI) based on quantitative results. Results: Fourteen women completed the survey and interview. Five, seven, and two women chose no colposcopy, appropriate colposcopy, and missed colposcopy, but returned for close interval surveillance, respectively. The qualitative themes provided a potent emerging theme: the eternal cycle of human papillomavirus (HPV) uncertainty, which provided context for the other identified themes centered around lack of knowledge leading to emotional burdens, which intersected with being seen as a Black woman. We found similar barriers that have been noted for screening, such as relationships, positive and negative, having some influence on follow-up behavior. Conclusions: With the shift to primary HPV screening, new educational platforms must be created and tailored to explain the HPV cycle for each racial/ethnic community. Precis: The lack of knowledge about the eternal cycle of HPV uncertainty leads to Black women's lack of colposcopy follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.