Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098302›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Clinical Significance and Translational Implications of Subclinical Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Adults: A Narrative Review.

Julian Eduardo Bedoya Jaramillo, Richard Adrian Vergara Trujillo, Jenny Tatiana Alarcón Plaza, Angie Carolin Vanegas Wilches, Bryan Nicolás Forero Vásquez, Walfred Ramiro Osorio Reyes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian Eduardo Bedoya JaramilloInternal Medicine, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt, CHL.
Richard Adrian Vergara TrujilloNephrology, DaVita Colombia, Cali, COL.
Jenny Tatiana Alarcón PlazaGeneral Practice, ESE Hospital San Francisco, Villa de Leyva, COL.
Angie Carolin Vanegas WilchesCritical Care Medicine, Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá - Hospital de San José, Bogotá, COL.
Bryan Nicolás Forero VásquezInternal Medicine, Fundación Hospital San Carlos, Bogotá, COL.
Walfred Ramiro Osorio ReyesInternal Medicine, Hospital Nacional de Jutiapa, Jutiapa, GTM.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature reports that there is a difference between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and subclinical interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs). The objective of this narrative review was to comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on the ILA spectrum, particularly subclinical ILA. We aimed to clarify the nuanced definitions and prevalence of ILAs in asymptomatic adults, delineate their recognized risk factors, and explore the histopathological and genetic underpinnings of these conditions. This narrative literature review was conducted using relevant topic-specific keywords such as "Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Abnormalities," "Interstitial Lung Abnormalities," "Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)," "Subclinical ILA," "Asymptomatic adults," "Computational tomography," "Incidental CT scan," "Serial CHEST CT," "Disease Progression," "Risk Factors," "Mortality," "Lung Function Tests," and "Genetic Factors." Boolean operators were used to incorporate the keywords and search on PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on full-text open-access articles from January 2015 to July 2025. In asymptomatic adults, subclinical interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) were considered incidental findings. It is now increasingly being recognized that these are at least predisposing factors to early-stage interstitial lung disease, yet their clinical implications are unclear. The incidence rises with age and exposure to smoking; however, much of that evidence lacks longitudinal follow-up studies that are detailed enough to distinguish mild ILAs with benign courses and progressive disease-producing ILAs. The asymptomatic ILA management is not standardized because there is a lack of universally accepted diagnostic criteria, risk stratification assessment tools, and clearly formulated instructions referring to surveillance. To transform ILAs as incident discoveries into some clinically actionable data, there is a need to widen the views by prospective studies, the generation of biomarkers, and investigation in long-term follow-ups.

Indexed as

asymptomatic adultsclinical significancenarrative reviewsubclinical interstitial lung abnormalitiestranslational implications

Identifiers

PMID41098302
PMCPMC12519098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.