ReviewCureus2025
The Clinical Significance and Translational Implications of Subclinical Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Adults: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome following acute lithium hydroxide dust exposure at a battery material production plant: a case series of 16 workers.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature reports that there is a difference between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and subclinical interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs). The objective of this narrative review was to comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on the ILA spectrum, particularly subclinical ILA. We aimed to clarify the nuanced definitions and prevalence of ILAs in asymptomatic adults, delineate their recognized risk factors, and explore the histopathological and genetic underpinnings of these conditions. This narrative literature review was conducted using relevant topic-specific keywords such as "Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Abnormalities," "Interstitial Lung Abnormalities," "Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease," "Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)," "Subclinical ILA," "Asymptomatic adults," "Computational tomography," "Incidental CT scan," "Serial CHEST CT," "Disease Progression," "Risk Factors," "Mortality," "Lung Function Tests," and "Genetic Factors." Boolean operators were used to incorporate the keywords and search on PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on full-text open-access articles from January 2015 to July 2025. In asymptomatic adults, subclinical interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) were considered incidental findings. It is now increasingly being recognized that these are at least predisposing factors to early-stage interstitial lung disease, yet their clinical implications are unclear. The incidence rises with age and exposure to smoking; however, much of that evidence lacks longitudinal follow-up studies that are detailed enough to distinguish mild ILAs with benign courses and progressive disease-producing ILAs. The asymptomatic ILA management is not standardized because there is a lack of universally accepted diagnostic criteria, risk stratification assessment tools, and clearly formulated instructions referring to surveillance. To transform ILAs as incident discoveries into some clinically actionable data, there is a need to widen the views by prospective studies, the generation of biomarkers, and investigation in long-term follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.