ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Complex inner and outer setting interactions determine feasibility and readiness of developing primary care registries in small island developing states: sequential mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We assessed feasibility and readiness for registry development and sought to understand the factors likely to affect the implementation of a registry into health systems in small island developing states (SIDS). Methods: We conducted online quantitative surveys and focus groups among health managers in four SIDS. Both survey and focus group guides were developed primarily based on four domains (inner setting, outer setting, individual characteristics and implementation process) of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Focus groups within each of four territories were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis using a deductively derived coding framework. We synthesized our findings using a systems archetype informed by the common themes emerging from the dual methods. Findings: From the 37 respondents of the online survey, 40% and 16% identified diabetes and hypertension as the highest priority NCDs for registry development. Respondents were more concerned about monitoring and improving care for patients (65%) than about determining disease burden (16%) or outcomes monitoring (8%). Strong mission alignment, external pressure and support and emerging data protection laws were identified as potential facilitators. Participants reported lack of human resource capacity and funding to support NCD registry and poor information systems infrastructure. The emerging systems archetype indicated that lack of investment in human and systems infrastructure were significant threats to registry success. Discussion: Despite external interest in registry development, infrastructural and human resource capacity barriers are likely contribute to a sub-optimal implementation in SIDS. We recommend greater collaboration between countries and enhanced regional support to overcome the challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.