ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
Using Variational Autoencoders for Out of Distribution Detection in Histological Multiple Instance Learning.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of histological image classification, Multiple Instance Learning (mil) methods only require labels at Whole Slide Image (wsi) level, effectively reducing the annotation bottleneck. However, for their deployment in real scenarios, they must be able to detect the presence of previously unseen tissues or artifacts, the so-called Out-of-Distribution (ood) samples. This would allow Computer Assisted Diagnosis systems to flag samples for additional quality or content control. In this work, we propose an ood-aware probabilistic deep mil model that combines the latent representation from a variational autoencoder and an attention mechanism. At test time, the latent representations of the instances are used in the classification and ood detection tasks. We also propose a deterministic version of the model that uses the reconstruction error as ood score. Panda (prostate tissue) and Camelyon16 (lymph node tissue) are used as train/test in-distribution datasets, obtaining bag classification results competitive with current state-of-the-art models. ood detection is evaluated performing two experiments for each in-distribution dataset. For Panda, Camelyon16 and artif (prostate tissue contaminated with artifacts) are used as ood datasets, obtaining 100% auc in both cases. For Camelyon16, Panda and bcell (lymph node tissue diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) are used as ood datasets, obtaining aucs of 100% and 97%, respectively. Experimental validation demonstrates the models' strong classification performance and effective ood slide detection, highlighting their clinical potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.