ArticleEJIFCC2025
Risk Assessment Analysis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia with Coronary Artery Stenosis Scoring: Intervention Strategies.
Article in EJIFCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is an established risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), with substantial evidence linking it to a higher prevalence of multivessel disease and worse cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to explore the relationship between lipid profile and diabetes with severity of CAD by evaluating the degree of stenosis as assessed by Gensini Score (GS). Methods: A total of 300 participants were included: 100 CAD patients with diabetes, 100 CAD patients without diabetes, and 100 healthy controls. Serum lipoproteins were quantified using standard colorimetric methods, while HbA1c levels were determined through HPLC. GS was assessed using angiographic data obtained from the catheterization laboratory. Results: Significant differences in lipid profile, and HbA1c were observed between diabetic CAD patients, non-diabetic CAD patients, and healthy controls. The GS in patients with CAD was markedly elevated in the diabetic CAD cohort (32.97±22.47) in comparison to the non-diabetic CAD cohort (28.70±20.60). A positive correlation was found between HbA1c (r Conclusion: Our results suggest that lipoproteins and diabetic indicators have a considerable impact on the severity of CAD. This highlights the need for a more personalized approach in managing diabetes and CAD, incorporating regular monitoring of glucose and lipid levels to evaluate cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41098221PMC12519630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.