Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098183›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2025

Optimal Transport based Cross-Domain Integration for Heterogeneous Data.

Yubai Yuan, Yijiao Zhang, Babak Shahbaba, Norbert Fortin, Keiland Cooper, Qing Nie, Annie Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yubai YuanDepartment of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Yijiao ZhangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Babak ShahbabaDepartment of Statistics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Norbert FortinDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6793-6984
Keiland CooperDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-9645
Qing NieDepartment of Mathematics, Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8804-3368
Annie QuDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8396-7828

Funding

Nicotinic enhancement of auditory-cognitive processingR01DC017687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Scalable Bayesian Stochastic Process Models for Neural Data AnalysisR01MH115697 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SHAHBABA, BABAK · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Development of tools for analyzing cell-cell communication using spatial transcriptomic dataR01GM152494 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Zixuan Cang, Qing Nie · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
SCH: Individualized learning and prediction for heterogeneous multimodal data from wearable devicesR01CA297869 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI Yuqing Guo, Annie Qu · 2024 to 2026
$900k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA297869NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017687NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152494NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting dynamic patterns shared across heterogeneous datasets is a critical yet challenging task in many scientific domains, particularly within the biomedical sciences. Systematic heterogeneity inherent in diverse data sources can significantly hinder the effectiveness of existing machine learning methods in uncovering shared underlying dynamics. Additionally, practical and technical constraints in real-world experimental designs often limit data collection to only a small number of subjects, even when rich, time-dependent measurements are available for each individual. These limited sample sizes further diminish the power to detect common dynamic patterns across subjects. In this article, we propose a novel heterogeneous data integration framework based on optimal transport to extract shared patterns in the conditional mean dynamics of target responses. The key advantage of the proposed method is its ability to enhance discriminative power by reducing heterogeneity unrelated to the signal. This is achieved through the alignment of extracted domain-shared temporal information across multiple datasets from different domains. Our approach is effective regardless of the number of datasets and does not require auxiliary matching information for alignment. Specifically, the method aligns longitudinal data from heterogeneous datasets within a common latent space, capturing shared dynamic patterns while leveraging temporal dependencies within subjects. Theoretically, we establish generalization error bounds for the proposed data integration approach in supervised learning tasks, highlighting a novel tradeoff between data alignment and pattern learning. Additionally, we derive convergence rates for the barycentric projection under Gromov-Wasserstein and fused Gromov-Wasserstein distances. Numerical studies on both simulated data and neuroscience applications demonstrate that the proposed data integration framework substantially improves prediction accuracy by effectively aggregating information across diverse data sources and subjects. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Indexed as

Distribution alignmentGromov-Wasserstein BarycenterLatent embeddingOptimal transportSemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41098183
PMCPMC12520601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.