ArticleAvicenna journal of medicine2025
Innovative Blended Learning Curriculum in Noninvasive Ventilation for Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows.
Article in Avicenna journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a lack of a standardized curriculum for the appropriate use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), which is readily accessible. Management of NIV is a core competency for physicians training in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM). We present a blended model of instruction that was highly successful in our pilot program. Methods: The curriculum targeted eight first-year PCCM fellows to assess knowledge and confidence in key competencies of NIV management. After a baseline assessment, fellows engaged in both hands-on instruction and traditional didactics in NIV. Following, fellows were encouraged to use the e-learning modules for enhanced instruction. The modules were designed to cover all major aspects of NIV management and with unique interactive patient cases for both inpatient and outpatient uses of NIV. Results: Eight first-year PCCM fellows completed the training and responded to the posttest assessment 4 weeks later. The average multiple-choice questions (MCQs) score increased from 13.5 ± 3.2 (54.0%) to 18.4 ± 1.6 (73.6%) and was significant ( Conclusion: This curriculum represents a successful and novel approach to NIV education, a critical but challenging core competency in pulmonary medicine for physicians training in PCCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.